I'd like to suggest that we drop the distinction between "permanent" and "current" working groups. I don't think that really means much these days. A more useful distinction might be to have an "active" and "inactive" list. What do you think? Chris Davenport (talk) 11:25, 25 November 2013 (CST)
- I'm good with it, a lot of the leadership pages need editing again anyway. CLT pages and their working groups have to be updated too. Tom Hutchison (talk) 11:45, 25 November 2013 (CST)
- +1 from me. Michael Babker (talk) 23:08, 25 November 2013 (CST)
Tom Hutchison (talk) something got broken in this page, I can see the tags translate in the output instead of being only in the source at the part of "current working groups"