Actions

Talk

Difference between revisions of "Production Working Groups"

From Joomla! Documentation

(Created page with "I'd like to suggest that we drop the distinction between "permanent" and "current" working groups. I don't think that really means much these days. A more useful distinction...")
 
(Reply)
 
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I'd like to suggest that we drop the distinction between "permanent" and "current" working groups.  I don't think that really means much these days.  A more useful distinction might be to have an "active" and "inactive" list.  What do you think? [[User:Chris Davenport|Chris Davenport]] ([[User talk:Chris Davenport|talk]]) 11:25, 25 November 2013 (CST)
 
I'd like to suggest that we drop the distinction between "permanent" and "current" working groups.  I don't think that really means much these days.  A more useful distinction might be to have an "active" and "inactive" list.  What do you think? [[User:Chris Davenport|Chris Davenport]] ([[User talk:Chris Davenport|talk]]) 11:25, 25 November 2013 (CST)
 +
:I'm good with it, a lot of the leadership pages need editing again anyway. CLT pages and their working groups have to be updated too. [[User:Hutchy68|Tom Hutchison]] ([[User talk:Hutchy68|talk]]) 11:45, 25 November 2013 (CST)
 +
:+1 from me.  [[User:Mbabker|Michael Babker]] ([[User talk:Mbabker|talk]]) 23:08, 25 November 2013 (CST)

Latest revision as of 00:08, 26 November 2013

I'd like to suggest that we drop the distinction between "permanent" and "current" working groups. I don't think that really means much these days. A more useful distinction might be to have an "active" and "inactive" list. What do you think? Chris Davenport (talk) 11:25, 25 November 2013 (CST)

I'm good with it, a lot of the leadership pages need editing again anyway. CLT pages and their working groups have to be updated too. Tom Hutchison (talk) 11:45, 25 November 2013 (CST)
+1 from me. Michael Babker (talk) 23:08, 25 November 2013 (CST)