Difference between revisions of "Production Working Groups"
From Joomla! Documentation
m (answer) |
(Reply) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'd like to suggest that we drop the distinction between "permanent" and "current" working groups. I don't think that really means much these days. A more useful distinction might be to have an "active" and "inactive" list. What do you think? [[User:Chris Davenport|Chris Davenport]] ([[User talk:Chris Davenport|talk]]) 11:25, 25 November 2013 (CST) | I'd like to suggest that we drop the distinction between "permanent" and "current" working groups. I don't think that really means much these days. A more useful distinction might be to have an "active" and "inactive" list. What do you think? [[User:Chris Davenport|Chris Davenport]] ([[User talk:Chris Davenport|talk]]) 11:25, 25 November 2013 (CST) | ||
:I'm good with it, a lot of the leadership pages need editing again anyway. CLT pages and their working groups have to be updated too. [[User:Hutchy68|Tom Hutchison]] ([[User talk:Hutchy68|talk]]) 11:45, 25 November 2013 (CST) | :I'm good with it, a lot of the leadership pages need editing again anyway. CLT pages and their working groups have to be updated too. [[User:Hutchy68|Tom Hutchison]] ([[User talk:Hutchy68|talk]]) 11:45, 25 November 2013 (CST) | ||
+ | :+1 from me. [[User:Mbabker|Michael Babker]] ([[User talk:Mbabker|talk]]) 23:08, 25 November 2013 (CST) |
Revision as of 00:08, 26 November 2013
I'd like to suggest that we drop the distinction between "permanent" and "current" working groups. I don't think that really means much these days. A more useful distinction might be to have an "active" and "inactive" list. What do you think? Chris Davenport (talk) 11:25, 25 November 2013 (CST)
- I'm good with it, a lot of the leadership pages need editing again anyway. CLT pages and their working groups have to be updated too. Tom Hutchison (talk) 11:45, 25 November 2013 (CST)
- +1 from me. Michael Babker (talk) 23:08, 25 November 2013 (CST)