Archived talk

Difference between revisions of "Vulnerable Extensions List"

From Joomla! Documentation

(Are Vulnerabilities confirmed?: new section)
(No difference)

Revision as of 03:54, 15 July 2011


  1. Some links left to cleanup.
  2. Should this format be converted to a wiki template for easier editing?
  3. Should each item be it's own file?
  4. Links to old forum topics are broken. Is there a pattern we can use to map these to the new forum path/topics?

Are Vulnerabilities confirmed?

I ask because, I cannot find any confirmation that a couple of these vulnerabilities are valid.

Obviously, many of theses are correct, but it seems like some of this is just parroting, without installing the extension, and running a test.

Should the unconfirmed vulnerabilities be flagged as such?