Talk

Objects methods and properties available from your template

From Joomla! Documentation

Revision as of 17:35, 25 September 2013 by Sovainfo (talk | contribs) (→‎Format of document)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Scope of document[edit]

Should this also include JApplication? Sovainfo (talk) 04:04, 25 September 2013 (CDT)

Yes but see below --Wilsonge (talk) 10:31, 25 September 2013 (CDT)

Format of document[edit]

Should the methods be links to documents in JDocument category? Should the name and description be turned into chunks or just copied between the two documents? Sovainfo (talk) 04:08, 25 September 2013 (CDT)

I think actually what we need is to delete this. None of these properties seem to actually be defined anywhere - you still have to access them through JFactory in the template index.html file (or where ever they are needed). And in that case I don't see the need for this to have it's own page. You just mention it in passing in a "Building a template" tutorial.
The only available things we have from $this is baseUrl, params and template
--Wilsonge (talk) 10:39, 25 September 2013 (CDT)
Understand your first sentence, the others don't make sense to me. Like I mentioned above they are methods, some of them described already in JDocuments category. When deleting this document, should that category be extended to document those methods? Sovainfo (talk) 14:17, 25 September 2013 (CDT)
To me when I see a page called "Editing Objects methods and properties available from your template" - I'd imagine it to be something like methods available using
$this->something
rather than just a list of methods you can use - which is effectively anything in the Joomla API - or an external library (gantry etc.). That's why I think this page is useless.
If we were to the page then yes the methods should link to the JDocuments category. But I really don't see the need to list all the JDocument methods here! --Wilsonge (talk) 15:49, 25 September 2013 (CDT)
Don't know what the creator of this document had in mind, but if we can't find a purpose for a particular audience than we can just as wel delete it. Sovainfo (talk) 17:35, 25 September 2013 (CDT)